Kevin Ryan banner

Announcements

 

 

BLOG: Kevin and Joe Tomei talk about issues in languages, teaching, culture and politics at languagejapan.com.

NEW: Kevin is National Treasurer of JALT

NEW: ShowaELC.org website for SWU English Language and Communications Dept.

NEW: What's Up Setagaya! radio program.

Student FAQ

1. Q: Where is my class page? A: Use the menu above.

2. Q: Where is Moodle? A: Click on button here.

Updated 2007-01-10

Thinking with the Computer 

A course for learning English, computer skills and thinking styles

Critical Thinking Final Project

Critical Thinking

Final Project

Review the Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages

* Read the titles of an excellent URL on Evaluating Web Pages at Berkeley
* Look at the shorter Cornell version.
* Look at Susan Beck's version with links to interesting examples.
* Look at Ohio States' version.

1. Read about Evaluating Web Pages for

2. Choose ONE out of three projects. (US Beef in Japan, The Sixties, Disney) Look at all seven sites, choose two to compare. It is best if the two are very different in quality (good and bad) or viewpoint (opposite opinions). NOTE: You can choose to do the Alternative if you like.)

American Beef in Japan

The Sixties (the 1960's in the USA)

Disney

Alternative

Find 3 sites about TWO of the questions below and evaluate them. Write one paragraph analysis about each site. One of these 3 sites can be in Japanese for each of two questions. (Total six paragraphs)

3. Write your final project. It should be about 6 paragraphs long. (Remember, each paragraph has one topic sentence and at least 4 supporting sentences.) Here is a sample plan for the 6 paragraphs:

  1. Introduction: Why did you choose your topic (Mayan, Sixties or Eggs) and why is it important?
  2. Link evaluation: One sentence about each link, its good and bad points.
  3. The two most interesting links: Which two links are most interesting to compare and why (because of quality or because of opposite opinions).
  4. The first link: A detailed view of accuracy, authorship, purpose, design and overall value.
  5. The second link: A detailed view of accuracy, authorship, purpose, design and overall value.
  6. Which one is best, first or second? Why?

Remember to enter your MS Word or Text docuemnt at kevinryan.com Moodle under your course name. by February 5, Wednesday. You can send to me in an email message or by using an attached (tempu) file from MS Word. 


  © Kevin Ryan 2001         ryan@kevinryan.com              Thinking with Computers course      Last Revised January 9, 2006